Sundara is friendly towards all the people. He is considered to be clever. He is one of the person I would most like to work with. He is smart and confident. He is considered as flexible and kindest. He is most hard working and talkative. As a person he is most often wrong.
Sundara during initial period of career
Sundara is one of the calmest person. He is serious and critical. Sundara irritates me most often. He is very reserved and talk less.
Wow what a difference between the two. How is it possible to make such a transition? What made him change his attitude and behaviour?
Is this called as change management? Does this mean I am suceeding as an Agent in change management?
Saturday, May 8, 2010
Saturday, May 1, 2010
Analysts' perspective of Global Economics
US Sub-prime crisis has reached an end now. India Inc is gaining confidence to grow its business to generate profitability and show growth.
Ohhh what a timing for the market. Now sovereign debt crisis is in the market. Already the stock market experienced a rolar-coaster ride this week. The market was weak due to the global economic imbalance caused due to the fear of sovereign crisis. It was expected that the crisis might affect all the countries as almost all the countries rearranged economic situation during sub-prime crisis and provided easy money throughout the period. Now due to this generous spending by govt. it is criticized that there is less money or huge debt piling up with each country.
As a layman it is interpreted that these Analysts are more cynic that they are not able to accept whatever is available in front of their eyes and instead they think of a situation which is expected not to occur. Is this a reaction due to the education they had or is it due to the inability to think long???
Ohhh what a timing for the market. Now sovereign debt crisis is in the market. Already the stock market experienced a rolar-coaster ride this week. The market was weak due to the global economic imbalance caused due to the fear of sovereign crisis. It was expected that the crisis might affect all the countries as almost all the countries rearranged economic situation during sub-prime crisis and provided easy money throughout the period. Now due to this generous spending by govt. it is criticized that there is less money or huge debt piling up with each country.
As a layman it is interpreted that these Analysts are more cynic that they are not able to accept whatever is available in front of their eyes and instead they think of a situation which is expected not to occur. Is this a reaction due to the education they had or is it due to the inability to think long???
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)